
7 OCT 2026Oslo Nightclub Shooting – Norway
7 OCT 2026 Salman Rushdie stabbed
On 12 August 2022, author Salman Rushdie was stabbed repeatedly on stage at the Chautauqua Institution in western New York as he was being introduced to speak, and lost the sight of one eye. Ralph Henry Reese, who was on stage with him, suffered a facial injury (SBS/AFP/AAP). Audience members restrained the attacker, Hadi Matar, until a state trooper arrested him.
A jury convicted Matar of attempted murder and assault in February 2025. On 16 May 2025, Chautauqua County Judge David Foley sentenced him to 25 years in prison, plus a concurrent seven-year term for wounding the second man (AP). On 29 July 2026, a federal jury convicted Matar of terrorism offences, including attempting to provide material support to Hizballah. The US Department of Justice said Matar attacked Rushdie "in an effort to carry out a fatwa calling for Rushdie's execution". It said the fatwa was issued in 1989 by Ruhollah Khomeini and reaffirmed in 2017 by Ali Khamenei. Federal sentencing was set for 3 November 2026, with a maximum penalty of life.
According to the US Department of Justice, before the attack "Matar discussed the fatwa — and Hizballah's endorsement of the fatwa — with individuals located in Iran, Australia, and Canada." The DOJ did not name those individuals or allege any wrongdoing by them.
More sources:
Hamas listed in full as a terrorist organisation
On 17 February 2022 Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews announced that the Government would list Hamas in its entirety as a terrorist organisation under the Criminal Code. Until then only its military wing, the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, had been listed, first in November 2003. The new listing, covering Hamas' political branch as well, took effect on 4 March 2022, in line with the UK, the US and Israel.
Andrews said: "There is no place in Australia for their hateful ideologies" and "It is vital that our laws target not only terrorist acts and terrorists, but also the organisations that plan, finance and carry out these acts." The ABC reported that people convicted of terrorist organisation offences, including membership, recruitment, training or fundraising, face up to 25 years' imprisonment.
The Executive Council of Australian Jewry called the decision "overdue but very welcome". The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network said it "strongly disagrees", warning it would worsen suffering for Palestinians.
What the submissions said
Parliament's Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security reviewed the listing in 2022. Of the twelve submissions, one supported it and eight opposed it or raised serious concerns. The quotes below are taken word for word from the submissions themselves.
In support
The Executive Council of Australian Jewry said it "agree[d] entirely" with the listing and the Minister's reasons (Committee report).
Australian Federation of Islamic Councils (AFIC), which calls itself "the peak body for Australian Muslims", in a submission authorised by its president Dr Rateb Jneid (Submission 9):
- "In its entirety, including the civilian social services arm of Hamas, Hamas cannot be properly characterised as a terrorist organisation."
- "The proposed listing appears to be politically motivated rather than based on evidence of Australians' best interests."
- "Australians may begin to fear donating to Palestinian causes, out of a concern that they may inadvertently be connected to Hamas as the governing administrator for Gaza."
AFIC added that it "does not seek to support or attack either of the parties to the conflict".
Australian Friends of Palestine Association (AFOPA), Adelaide, signed by Paul Heywood-Smith QC (Submission 6):
- "Hamas was within its rights to resist Israeli aggression and to do so with deadly violence, including by the use of rockets, the only form of resistance left open to it."
- "Hamas is not a terrorist organization."
- "Hamas has the right in international law to resist the crime of apartheid being carried out in its historic home."
AFOPA's submission also quoted former UN Special Rapporteur John Dugard: "if either side is to be designated as 'terrorist' it is the State of Israel rather than Hamas".
Australia Palestine Advocacy Network (APAN) (Submission 11):
- The earlier 2021 review "is akin to a court case where only the prosecution, and not the defence was heard, effectively a Kangaroo Court."
- "There is no evidence that any money raised for governance or humanitarian work is diverted to the Qassam Brigades."
- "The designation of the entirety of Hamas therefore could appear to criminalise the entirety of the population of Gaza".
Palestine Israel Ecumenical Network (PIEN), a Christian network, signed by its president Helen Rainger (Submission 5):
- Hamas' actions are "a regrettable, but tragically inevitable consequence of Israel's occupation of Palestinian land".
- The listing "is biased and unnecessary and should be revoked forthwith."
- "If the French resistance … was appropriate at that time in the face of the German occupation, Palestinian resistance – including by Hamas in Gaza – is also appropriate in the face of the Israeli occupation and violence."
Friends of Sabeel Australia, a Christian group, signed by its president the Revd Dr Gregory C. Jenks (Submission 4):
- "This submission should not be misunderstood as expressing support for Hamas, and particularly its historical commitment to armed struggle."
- "It is possible that no charity registered in Australia will be able to direct funds towards the Al Ahli Arab Hospital or other similar NGOs in Gaza."
- It urged the Committee "to disallow the listing of the whole of Hamas as a terrorist organisation and to restrict that listing to the al-Qassam Brigade."
Professor Ben Saul, Challis Chair of International Law, University of Sydney (Submission 8):
- "Hamas 'in its entirety' likely meets the statutory criteria for listing", and "there is ample evidence that Hamas uses violence to compel Israel for a political purpose."
- "It does not meet the most important criterion – a threat to Australia".
- "Australia's simplistic approach of banning Hamas, irrespective of addressing the structural conditions conductive to its violence, is unjustifiable and counter-productive."
Associate Professor Tristan Dunning and five other academics (Submission 12):
- "Indubitably, the Qassam Brigades have committed numerous atrocities throughout their history, including the targeting of civilians."
- "Armed resistance against foreign occupation (including the siege of Gaza), moreover, is legitimate under international law".
- "In brief, Hamas is no threat to Australia."
The Government's own statement of reasons said there were "no known direct links between Hamas and Australia", noting an Australian-American dual national was killed in a 2001 suicide bombing attributed to Hamas' Brigades in Jerusalem.
The Committee found the Government "was within its powers" to list Hamas, and that the concerns raised "do not negate the statutory basis or legality" of the decision. It recommended the Government engage with the Palestinian-Australian community and aid groups so people understand the limits of the offences, including the exemptions for family contact and humanitarian aid.
The Government did not formally respond to the 2022 report until April 2026, more than three years later. It accepted both recommendations, "noting that Government agencies do not provide legal advice to private citizens", and that "with the passage of time, it is a matter for the Committee whether a briefing is of assistance".
More sources:
- Minister for Home Affairs - Hamas listed as terrorist organisation
- aph.gov.au - Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security: Listing of Hamas
- aph.gov.au - Australian Government response to the Committee report (April 2026)
- aph.gov.au - Submission 6, Australian Friends of Palestine Association
- aph.gov.au - Submission 9, Australian Federation of Islamic Councils
- aph.gov.au - Submission 11, Australia Palestine Advocacy Network
- aph.gov.au - Submission 5, Palestine Israel Ecumenical Network
- aph.gov.au - Submission 4, Friends of Sabeel Australia
- aph.gov.au - Submission 8, Professor Ben Saul
- aph.gov.au - Submission 12, Dunning and others
Introduction
Just after 1am on Saturday 25 June 2022, a man opened fire outside two bars on Rosenkrantz' gate in central Oslo. One was the London Pub, a long-standing bar in the city's gay scene, and the other was Per på hjørnet, next door. Oslo Pride was underway, and the parade was due to start that afternoon.
The shooter was Zaniar Matapour, an Iranian-born Norwegian citizen, then 44. Police said he was already known to them and to the Police Security Service (PST). He was arrested at the scene.
Two men were killed and nine others were wounded by gunfire; the ABC reported 21 people injured in all. The Oslo District Court later found he had fired ten rounds from a submachine gun and eight from a handgun. The court was explicit about the target: "The attack undoubtedly targeted gay people. The goal was both to kill as many gay people as possible and to instill fear in LGBTQ people more broadly."
What the court was told about the hour before
According to the prosecution, about fifty minutes before the first shot Matapour sent an audio file to an associate in which he pledged allegiance (a bay'ah) to Islamic State. PST described the attack as an Islamist act of terror and raised the national threat level from 3 to 5, the top of the scale.
Government Response
That morning
Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre was told during the night. Shortly after 6am he called the attack shocking and deeply disturbing. At the government's press conference he said that when the shooting started, happiness, laughter and love had been turned into hate, bullets and murder. He said the queer community were the victims.
Oslo Pride cancelled the parade and the rest of the day's events on police advice. The organisers said they would mark the day from home. The leader of Oslo's city government, Raymond Johansen, said the events were postponed, not abandoned.
A warning, five days out
Matapour was not an unknown man. An evaluation commissioned by the National Police Directorate and PST, reported in June 2023, found that the Norwegian Intelligence Service had warned PST at an emergency meeting that an operation was about to take place in a Scandinavian country, with several clues pointing to Norway. The warning arrived five days before the shooting.
The evaluation found the attack could have been averted if that notification had been handled differently, or if PST had opened a preventive investigation into Matapour in the months before. It found PST held relevant intelligence on him but did not pass it to the police officers responsible for following him up. The Oslo Police operational response on the night was judged adequate, but its crisis communication was not.
PST director Beate Gangås apologised for the misjudgments. Justice Minister Emilie Enger Mehl called the report serious and said she would follow it up. A later parliamentary committee put the main responsibility for the failure to avert the attack on PST, and found the Intelligence Service had passed on what it had. A separate oversight review found no basis to say the Intelligence Service had provoked the shooting. The trial court reached the same conclusion: the attack would have happened without that contact.
The sentence
On 4 July 2024 the Oslo District Court convicted Matapour of murder and aggravated terrorism. He was sentenced to 30 years' preventive detention (forvaring) with a minimum of 20 years, the longest term available, which can be extended if a court later finds he is still a danger. The court also ordered compensation for the survivors and the families. He denied criminal guilt but did not dispute the shooting. He appealed, then withdrew the appeal before the hearing in February 2025, so the sentence is final.
A second man, Arfan Bhatti, was charged with complicity in aggravated terrorism. He had been in Pakistan on the night of the attack and was extradited in 2024. On 16 January 2026 the Oslo District Court convicted him and imposed the same maximum term of 30 years. He appealed immediately, and his lawyers said he maintains he had no involvement.
Summary
On the night before the Oslo Pride parade, a man known to the security service shot into the crowd outside a gay bar and the bar next door, killing two people and wounding nine. A court found that the target was gay people, and that he had pledged allegiance to Islamic State in the hour before.
The Prime Minister spoke before dawn, and the parade was cancelled. An official evaluation later found PST had been warned five days earlier and had not acted on it, and the director of PST apologised. The court gave the shooter the longest sentence in Norwegian law. A second man, who was abroad that night, was convicted of helping to plan the attack and has appealed.
In Australia, the attack was reported by the ABC and SBS. The verdict and the evaluation are both public documents.
You be the judge.
